Posted on 1 Comment

Still Struggling with MT 3.01D

The upgrade appeared to go successfully. All of the data is intact, and I’m obviously still able to make new entries. But I’m still vexed by two problems.

First, I can’t save template changes. I’ve been editing the MySQL database directly to work around this, but that is a royal PITA. The good folks at MT have been trying to help me resolve, but no luck so far.

Secondly, the TypeKey authentication for the comment system still isn’t working properly. It might be related to an old template, so I’m going through and making sure I’m using the latest and greatest. In the meantime, if you have any suggestions on my TypeKey and MT problems, you’ll have to just email them to jeff.hester@gmail.com

Posted on Leave a comment

Moveable Type 3.0

Damned spammers have been plaguing my blog for the past five days. I’ve always had the occasional spammer, leaving the odd (yet nearly always complimentary) comment along with a link to their porn site. And I’ve always deleted their comments and banned their IP.

But in the past week they stepped things up, and are more sophisticated about spoofing IP addresses. So I’ve upgraded to MT 3.0, which supposedly will allow greater control over who can comment. Let me know if you notice the change, and what you think.

Posted on Leave a comment

More on Moore

Is Michael Moore right? Last time around, I explained that I don’t like Moore’s tactics, but I appreciate the role he plays in society. This morning I stumbled across an excellent site that provides a wealth of information on Moore’s latest work, Fahrenheit 9/11. Disinfopedia describes itself as an “encyclopedia of people, issues and groups shaping the public agenda.” It was featured as one of this week’s Yahoo! Picks — another nice resource for discovering new corners of the web.

Disinfopedia is sponsored by the Center for Media & Democracy which favors liberal social policy. Still, I found the reporting fairly balanced, leaving you to investigate and draw your own conclusions.

Posted on 2 Comments

3 Things You Can Never Discuss

There’s an old saying that you should never discuss sex, politics or religion in polite company. Thankfully, I never promised to be polite… at least not here. Let’s see if we can knock the cobwebs out of a few craniums, shall we?

Politics

I am a registered and unrepentant Republican. Does that make you squirm? I know it does many of my friends. Sir Winston Churchill once said “Anyone who is not a liberal in his youth has no heart. Anyone who remains so as he matures has no brain!”

The policies of Democratic party have never resonated with me. On the other hand, many of the social policies of the Republican party make my hair bristle. I’m more of a fiscal conservative and a social moderate, with Libertarian leanings. I believe that thinking people do not vote along party lines, and so I remain a Republican with a clear conscience.

But sometimes the liberal voices drive me crazy. Michael Moore is one such voice. Regardless of what you think of his political views, its easy to agree that he is a pompous asshole. He lives for the media frenzy, and does his best to stir it up, even if it means contorting facts to fit his point of view. In spite of my distaste for his style of communication, I believe we need people like Mr. Moore.

Michael Moore’s new film Fahrenheit 9/11 is a bona-fide box office bonanza. The documentary grossed more in the opening weekend than his previous film Bowling for Columbine made in it’s entire run. I’ve yet to see the film (I plan to as time allows), but it’s well known that Moore blasts Bush for everything from the election, family ties to the Bin Laden clan, and of course, the war in Iraq.

Before Moore, I looked at documentaries as scholarly works based on fact. He clearly demolished that objectivity with “Bowling,” taking liberties with facts and showing clips out of context merely to build a case for his political views. He raises good points worthy of thoughtful discussion, but if you accept his views without question, you’ll be duped.

So what have we learned, kids? Question authority, certainly. But also question those that pit themselves against authority. Be a skeptic.

Sex

I was watching William Gibson’s agonizing long No Maps for these Territories last night, and he reiterated a statement you’ve probably heard before: pornography has repeatedly been a catalyst for technological advancement. Why? Because sex sells. It led to VCRs, digital cameras, DVDs, advancements in web security, streaming media and many other technologies now commonly applied to more mainstream pursuits. Some folks even use sex to sell the Good Word (not that there’s anything wrong with that).

A commonly held misconception is that men think about sex once every seven seconds. In reality, who knows? If I thought about it every seven seconds, I’d never be able to complete this blog entry (let alone get any real work done).

We are wired for sex. Designed to procreate; to “…be fruitful and multiply…” So why is sex a taboo subject? I’m not entirely sure. Who cares? I’m in favor of sex. More sex for everyone and there’d be a helluva lot less wars.

Religion

Many people kill and maim in the name of God. Others deny the possibility of of a creator for that very reason.

I believe in God. I’ll be the first to admit that I can’t fully grasp God, nor do I fully comprehend they why’s and how’s of the world. Can the finite comprehend the infinite?

Cyberspace creates the technological possibility of alternate dimensions — virtual reality. Scientists believe that there are as many as ten dimensions of space and time that we do not participate in. These constructs may or not help explain how God moves or acts in time. But they do allow my mortal mind to concede that there’s much more to this universe than meets the eye.

If you choose to put your faith in something else — technology, humanism, or yourself — that’s your business. I’ll be happy to discuss religion and faith with you, but only if you promise not to shoot me where we disagree.

Politics, sex and religion. Why was it we can’t discuss them?

Posted on Leave a comment

JetBlue

I’m told that travelling by airplane used to be a somewhat formal event. Passengers dressed up as if they were going to church; gentlemen wearing suits and ties; women wearing tailored dresses. I don’t entirely understand why this was. Maybe travelling by plane felt like a special event? Perhaps they wore their Sunday best because the plane would literally take them closer to God? Or was it really just the fear of death — at least they’d die looking good?

That was way before my time, and I wonder if the overall experience of flying has degraded. When I fly, it’s almost always coach. Flying coach on a crowded flight (aren’t they all?) is worse than a trip on a bus. The rows have been squeezed to close together that my knees rub the seat in front of me. You sit close enough to the passengers on either side of you that it would be considered inappropriate in any other setting. Any sense of a special trip is lost amid a sea of human flesh.

Thursday morning I flew across the country, from Long Beach to Maryland, for my nephew’s wedding. This was my first trip on one of the newer airlines: JetBlue. Those of you who know me might suggest I have a bias for all things blue, but indigo-hued name aside, it really was a superior experience.

First, they fly out of Long Beach. This is a really, really small airport. The kind where you walk out onto the tarmac and climb a set of stairs to board the plane. But this, to me, is an advantage over LAX or any other mega-airport where you must park miles away from anything, shuttle to the terminal, walk what seems like miles to the gate, work your way elbow-to-elbow with the crowd.

In contrast, the long-term parking at Long Beach is only a hundred yards further than the short-term parking. There is one building for ticketing, and the planes are right behind it. It’s relatively easy to get in and out. Works for me.

If you’ve ever seen any JetBlue commercials, you know that they tout their leather seats and personal DirectTV screens for every passenger. Those are nice, but what I really appreciated was the extra legroom. I could actually cross my legs without contorting my body.

The entire JetBlue fleet is comprised of brand new Airbus planes. They are well designed, comfortable and clean. It’s a small thing, but some planes I’ve flown on other airlines have a well-worn look that doesn’t serve them well. There may be some safety advantage to a newer fleet, but I don’t have the expertise to comment on that definitively.

There are a few tips to be aware of on JetBlue. First, they don’t serve meals. They do serve drinks and snacks (twice on my cross-country trip). You’re welcome to bring your own meal if you’re so inclined. Personally, the snacks were perfect for me.

Second, you’ll get the best rates if you book online. They offer special web fares that further discount their already low prices (they are very competitive).

Third, if you’re into TV, you can check out the programming that will be available for your flight. It’s actually live programming, so you can keep abreast of the financial news.

Finally, their TV screens use standard 1/8″ stereo jacks. If you prefer high-quality audio, bring your own headphones — they’ll work just fine. If not, they provide adequate headphones that you may keep. They’ll work in your computer and pretty much any portable audio device.

JetBlue currently has a limited number of cities they fly to, so unless you’re travelling on one of their routes, you may be out of luck. The are not listed in the typical travel websites (Expedia, Travelocity, etc.). If you’re shopping for the best deals, start there, then check the JetBlue website.

The bottom line? I like JetBlue, and I’ll fly them every chance I get.

Posted on Leave a comment

Coming Like Light

As far as commutes go, driving the Ortega Highway is actually a wonderful way to start your day. The sunny blue skies of the inland empire give way to June gloom and the salt air of San Juan Capistrano. The wildflowers are in bloom. And this morning, IZZ provided the aural stimulation.

So I reach for her and she moves closer to me
Whispering a secret faithfully
She says, “To love someone is to learn the song that is inside their heart
And sing it to them when they cannot remember how it starts.”

I will sing your song
When you need it, my love
I will sing your song
Be sure that with me you belong

– IZZ Coming Like Light – I Move

Posted on Leave a comment

The Evil of Contentment

I’ve been thinking about contentment. All my life, I’ve been taught that contentment is a virtue — a trait worthy of developing.

The Bible teaches that we should learn to be content with whatever we have (Hebrews 13:5). Many great minds have written about the virtues of contentment.

“He is richest who is content with the least.” Socrates

“He is well paid that is well satisfied.” William Shakespeare

“He who is content can never be ruined.” Chinese Proverb

“He who wants little always have enough.” Johann Georg Zimmerman

I could go on, but I’d only be driving a nail with a sledgehammer. The world around me has said in a resounding voice: “BE CONTENT!” But is contentment everything its cracked up to be? How do I reconcile the desire to excel with the admonision to be content?

I’ve come to the conclusion that there are three options available to me at any point in time. The first, and easiest option is to be content without reflection. This is, however, a lazy answer to a complex problem. The slacker’s credo: Why try harder when this is good enough? The obvious flaw with this option is that it does not reflect our true nature. We are engineered — genetically wired — to be the best we can be. To be anything less is a formula for misery.

I don’t believe that this option is truly what the philosophers and teachers had in mind when they goaded us toward contentment. Otherwise we’d all be content with unhappy relationships, crummy jobs, substandard lifestyles and a world that sucks.

No, I think contentment is better expressed by the Serenity Prayer:

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

This is the second option. The key is the symbiotic relationship between accepting what we cannot change (contentment) and changing what we can! Contentment isn’t some mushy, half-assed excuse for accepting less that what we know we are capable of. On the contrary, contentment comes only after knowing that we’ve done what we can — all we can do, in fact.

The third option is a distortion of the second, and it’s seldom crystalline in appearance: overreaching and wanting more that we can have, or deserve.

So I’m to go for it and change what’s in my power to change. When will I know if I’m reaching too high? Should the fear of over-reaching paralyze me from ever trying?

There are many things in life that I could change. Many things that I am changing. And many more are beyond my control. This is the gray area. My vision of the possible future involves two variables; my effort (what I can control) and the influence of things beyond my control. So should I not have the vision? Should I not hope for and reach for things that I cannot completely control?

This past weekend I heard a quote by Roy D. Chapin Jr., former chairman and CEO of American Motors Corp. He said: “Luck is the time when preparation and opportunity meet.”

I’m not content with mediocrity. I’m preparing for the opportunity. When it comes, I’ll be ready — I’ll “get lucky.” If I don’t recognize the opportunity when it arrives, I must learn to accept the consequences with grace. And be content… until the next opportunity.